← back to the index
IC-001 Polar expedition · Canadian Arctic 1848

Franklin’s Lost Expedition — every man died, and the Inuit were right all along

coldscurvystarvationall-lost1800s
Lost
129
Bound for
The Northwest Passage
Ended
King William Island, 1848
Status
All lost

Summary

In May 1845 the Royal Navy sent Sir John Franklin into the Canadian Arctic with two bomb vessels, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, to complete the last unmapped link of the Northwest Passage. Every one of the 129 men aboard died. The ships were beset in the ice off King William Island in September 1846, were never freed, and were abandoned in April 1848. The survivors dragged boats and sledges south across the sea ice and the island toward the Back River and died strung out along the way, of cold, starvation, scurvy and the slow toxic accumulation of a flawed supply system. It remains the deadliest disaster in the history of polar exploration.

The expedition was, on paper, the best-equipped Arctic venture Britain had ever launched: three years of tinned provisions, steam engines, internal heating, libraries. It vanished into a region the Admiralty believed it understood and did not. No survivor was ever found, and no continuous written account survives beyond a single two-line note left under a cairn at Victory Point. That note, signed by Captains Francis Crozier and James Fitzjames, records that Franklin had died on 11 June 1847 and that 105 men deserted the ships on 22 April 1848 — the last dated word from anyone aboard.

What is known of the men's final months comes not from the Navy but from the Inuit, who saw the survivors, who later found their bodies and their gear, and who told searchers plainly what had happened: men starving, men dying as they walked, and bodies that bore the marks of cannibalism among the last to live. The Hudson's Bay surveyor John Rae carried that testimony back to Britain in 1854 and was vilified for it, most famously by Charles Dickens, who could not accept that British sailors might eat their dead and dismissed the Inuit as unreliable savages. The forensic record has since proved the Inuit account correct in nearly every particular. The same Inuit knowledge, carried in oral history for more than a century and a half, ultimately led searchers to the wrecks of Erebus in 2014 and Terror in 2016.

Timeline

19 May 1845
Departure from Greenhithe
Erebus and Terror sail from Kent with 134 men, provisions for three years, and steam engines salvaged from railway locomotives.
Jul 1845
Last European contact
Five men are discharged sick in Greenland, reducing the complement to 129; whalers see the ships moored to an iceberg in Baffin Bay.
Sep 1846
Beset off King William Island
Erebus and Terror are trapped in the pack ice in Victoria Strait and never sail freely again.
11 Jun 1847
Franklin dies
Sir John Franklin dies aboard, cause unrecorded; command passes to Francis Crozier, captain of Terror.
25 Apr 1848
The Victory Point note
Crozier and Fitzjames record that 24 men have already died and that the ships were deserted on 22 April, with 105 survivors.
26 Apr 1848
The retreat south begins
The survivors set out for the Back River, hauling ship's boats mounted on sledges across the ice.
1848–1850
The column dies
The men perish in stages down the west coast of King William Island and the mainland approaches; none reach safety.
1850
First graves found
Searchers locate three 1846 graves on Beechey Island, the expedition's first winter camp, but no message.
1854
Rae carries the Inuit account
John Rae reports Inuit testimony of starvation and cannibalism near the Back River, and is publicly attacked for it.
1859
The note recovered
Leopold McClintock's search finds the Victory Point note and a boat with two skeletons, confirming the southern retreat.
1984–1986
The Beechey exhumations
Owen Beattie exhumes three frozen crewmen and reports high lead levels, reviving debate over the tinned-food supply.
2014 / 2016
The wrecks found
Guided by Inuit oral history, Parks Canada locates Erebus in 2014 and Terror in 2016.

The best-equipped ship into the worst-known sea

By 1845 the Northwest Passage was less a geographic prize than an institutional obsession. Most of the Arctic archipelago had been charted; a relatively short unmapped gap remained between the explored channels of the east and the known coastline of the mainland to the southwest. The Admiralty treated the closing of that gap as a near-formality and gave it to Franklin, a 59-year-old veteran whose earlier overland expeditions had been marked by disaster and survival in roughly equal measure.

The ships themselves were exceptional. Erebus and Terror were reinforced bomb vessels, their hulls plated and strengthened for ice, fitted with retractable screw propellers driven by converted locomotive engines, with hot-water heating and provisions for three years — including roughly eight thousand tins of preserved meat, soup and vegetables. The expedition carried no Indigenous guides and no dog teams in the Inuit manner, and its plan rested on a fixed assumption: that the ships would force the passage in a season or two, wintering as needed, and emerge in the Pacific. The Navy had no contingency for ships that did not emerge at all, and no relief was scheduled, because the possibility that the entire expedition might simply be swallowed had not been seriously planned for.

The fatal stretch lay around King William Island. The route the ships took, down Victoria Strait on the island's western side, exposed them to the heavy multi-year ice streaming down from the polar sea. A channel on the island's eastern side — the one later vessels used — would likely have offered passage. Franklin took the western route and the ice took the ships.

Beset, abandoned, and walking to die

The ships were locked in by September 1846 and held through the winter and the following summer, which never freed them. Men began to die. By the time of the Victory Point note in April 1848, 24 were already dead — a death rate, after less than two years, far above anything that cold and accident alone should have produced in well-provisioned sailors. Something in the expedition's own supplies and condition was killing them.

Scurvy was almost certainly central. The Navy understood lemon juice as an antiscorbutic but the potency of its supply degraded over the long voyage, and three years was beyond what the ration could protect against. Lead is the contested factor: Owen Beattie's 1980s study of the three Beechey Island bodies found elevated lead, and the lead-soldered seams of the cheaply contracted tins were an obvious suspect, alongside the ships' internal water systems. Later re-analysis has pushed back hard — arguing that the bone-lead burdens were typical of Victorians ashore, that the timeline of solder exposure does not fit, and that zinc deficiency and plain starvation better explain the collapse. Tainted or spoiled tinned food may also have caused outright illness. The honest verdict is that no single poison brought the expedition down; cold, scurvy, malnutrition and a compromised food supply acted together on men already dying.

When Crozier led the 105 survivors off the ships on 26 April 1848, he chose to walk roughly 1,000 kilometres to a Hudson's Bay post via the Back River — a route no part of his sick, scorbutic, sledge-hauling column could realistically complete. The men dragged ship's boats laden with silverware, books and gear that served no purpose on the ice. They died in a strung-out line down the coast. The Inuit who encountered them described emaciated men dropping as they walked, and later found tents and a boat full of bodies. Among the remains were the cut and broken bones of men who had, at the very end, eaten their dead in order to keep moving a little farther.

The reckoning: the Inuit account and the forensic vindication

The decisive evidence about how the men died came from the only people who were there. Between the late 1840s and the 1860s, Inuit hunters gave consistent, detailed testimony to searchers: the location of the beset ships, the line of the dying march, the cache sites, and the cannibalism among the last survivors. John Rae gathered the core of it in 1854 near Pelly Bay, reporting that some thirty-five to forty men had starved near the Back River and that mutilated bodies showed the men had been "driven to the last resource." His report, and his refusal to flatter the Navy's image of itself, made him a target.

Charles Dickens led the public assault. In his journal Household Words he argued that no Englishman would resort to cannibalism and that the testimony of "savages" was worthless — language that was both factually wrong and openly racist. Lady Franklin's campaign to protect her husband's legend reinforced the rejection. For more than a century the Inuit account was treated as Arctic rumour. Then the bones spoke: forensic study of remains on King William Island, notably by Anne Keenleyside, identified cut marks consistent with defleshing and dismemberment on dozens of individuals, and later work found evidence of pot-polishing consistent with boiling bones for marrow — the end-stage cannibalism the Inuit had described. The record now treats their testimony as the most accurate single source on the expedition's fate, and Rae as having been right and wronged.

The Five Factors

01
The unplanned rescue gap
The Admiralty dispatched 129 men on a multi-year voyage with no scheduled relief and no agreed fallback if the ships failed to emerge. By the time anyone could mount a search, years had passed and the men were long dead. A venture with no rescue plan treats its crew's lives as a bet on conditions no one controlled.
02
Supply as a slow weapon
The expedition's three years of provisions were also three years of accumulating risk: degrading antiscorbutics, possibly lead-contaminated tins, and a diet that left men short of the nutrients survival required. Logistics that look generous in tonnage can be lethal in composition. The food kept them alive long enough to die of what the food lacked.
03
The fatal route choice
Sending the ships down the western, ice-choked side of King William Island, into the multi-year pack of Victoria Strait, was the decision that beset them. A different channel was passable. In hostile terrain, a single routing choice made on incomplete knowledge can be irreversible.
04
Escalation by foot
Abandoning the ships to man-haul a thousand kilometres, with loaded boats and silverware, committed sick and scorbutic men to a march none could finish. Once the ships were lost the survivors compounded the loss by pressing a plan that the evidence of their own bodies should have ruled out.
05
The refusal of local knowledge
The expedition carried no Inuit guides into a region the Inuit knew intimately, and Britain then spent decades rejecting the Inuit account of what had happened. The same knowledge that could have helped the men survive, and later told the truth about their deaths, was discounted because of who held it. Ignoring local expertise cost lives twice over.

Aftermath

The search for Franklin became one of the great endeavours of the nineteenth century, sending dozens of expeditions into the Arctic over more than a decade. Those searches, ironically, mapped far more of the archipelago than Franklin ever did and confirmed the existence of a navigable passage — first transited end to end by Roald Amundsen in 1903–06, by the eastern route past King William Island that Franklin had not taken. The disaster reshaped how Britain understood Arctic risk, though its lessons about local knowledge took far longer to land.

The human toll was total: all 129 men, the largest loss of life of any polar expedition before or since. Their graves are scattered across King William Island and the mainland approaches, and remains are still being identified — in recent years by DNA matched to living descendants. The wrecks of Erebus (found 2014) and Terror (found 2016) now lie within Nunavut as a national historic site co-stewarded with Inuit, who located them through oral history that Victorian Britain had dismissed. John Rae, vilified in his lifetime, has been formally rehabilitated, with a memorial in Westminster Abbey unveiled in 2014 — the same year his informants' descendants helped find the first ship.

Lessons

  1. Plan the rescue before the departure: a long expedition with no scheduled relief and no fallback is a death sentence waiting on the weather.
  2. Audit supplies for what they lack, not just their tonnage — degrading antiscorbutics, contaminated tins and an unbalanced diet kill as surely as an empty hold.
  3. Treat a single route choice in hostile terrain as potentially irreversible, and weight it against the worst-known conditions, not the hoped-for ones.
  4. When the first plan fails, test the next one against the actual condition of the people, not the map; a march the sick cannot finish is not a rescue.
  5. Carry and credit local knowledge: the people who know the country can keep you alive, and when they tell you what happened, believe the evidence rather than the legend.

References